Blog Layout

Airborne Toxic Metal Inhalation Higher in Communities of Color

Laura Quigley • Dec 19, 2022


Airborne Toxic Metal Inhalation Higher in Communities of Color

By Laura Quigley


A recent study in Nature Communications expands on what many Baltimore residents already know. We are living with environmental injustices in the city every day.


Not only are predominantly Black and Latino communities exposed to higher rates of air pollution, their residents also inhale far higher concentrations of airborne toxic metals than predominantly white communities. What that means: shorter life spans, more expensive health problems and difficulty breathing. 


In Baltimore, residents in neighborhoods such as Westport and Curtis Bay live under the shadow of industries involved in manufacturing, incineration, and shipbuilding. The industries may or may not be there anymore – and many do not provide the jobs they once did – but the legacy pollution remains in many cases. And it harms the quality of life. 


According to a study commissioned by the Chesapeake Bay Foundation in 2017, the nitrous oxide pollution from the Wheelabrator incinerator alone is responsible for $21 million in health and mortality costs in Maryland each year. 


The recent toxic metal study shows that nitrous oxide pollution is not the only cause for concern. 


According to an 
article published in The Washington Post, the study found that “in highly segregated counties, the average mass proportion of all fine-particulate metals associated with human-caused emissions was three to 12 times higher than in well-integrated ones.” Residents in predominantly Black and Latino communities are inhaling toxic metals, such as lead, nickel, copper, and zinc, in amounts far greater than their counterparts in communities that are racially integrated or primarily white.


How to change this disparity? Cleaning up pollution everywhere, of course, is the goal. But in particular, policymakers must look at the why of it all. Zoning laws, redlining, and other discriminatory practices have kept undesirable industries in certain parts of cities while banning them from other parts. The communities impacted most often don’t have a voice, either because of gerrymandering or lack of representation. Environmental justice means righting these wrongs through new policies that ensure everyone has the same rights to clean air and clean water. At least we’re talking about it now, and one step closer to maybe getting to a more equitable world.

By Laura Quigley 11 Mar, 2024
Urban Farm Profile: The 6th Branch
By Laura Quigley 04 Mar, 2024
Reel Rewards Program to Launch in Baltimore, MD: Incentivizing Sustainable Fishing
By Rona Kobell 01 Mar, 2024
Farewell from EJJI Co-Founder Rona Kobell
By Veronica Lucchese 14 Feb, 2024
Managing the Potomac: Featuring the Patawomeck Tribe of Virginia
By Rona Kobell 12 Feb, 2024
Eroding History Goes to Orono
By Rona Kobell 26 Jan, 2024
What Stopped the Bleeding of the Highway Wound?  New environmental laws were only part of the story for Baltimore’s road to nowhere
By Laura Quigley 23 Jan, 2024
Jessica's Journey: Navigating Environmental Justice from Houston to the Knauss Fellowship
By Laura Quigley 16 Jan, 2024
Northern Virginia Data Centers Endanger Climate, Communities, and Conservation
By Rona Kobell 14 Dec, 2023
See Eroding History in Baltimore: Four New Opportunities
By Rona Kobell 14 Dec, 2023
Losing History Just as We Find it: Lessons Around Harriet Tubman
More Posts
Share by: